President Obama has been in office for fewer than 120 days. In that time he’s successfully changed the way the world considers the United States, and the way Americans consider their economic future. While there will always be doomsayers for every administration, to me it is clear that our country is held in better standing throughout the world than it was just four months ago, and that our economic future is not careening down a hopeless path as it seemed not long ago.
120 days. If this were a pregnancy we’d still be permitted to fly. It’s an incredible shift that has occurred within a very brief time period. The Obama administration is making progress on issues that were talked about for decades but not confronted: energy alternatives, changes to the car industry, healthcare reform. The speed with which the new guard operates is dizzying.
But here comes the speed bump. Nancy Pelosi. While I am politically aligned with her views, I wish she would just step aside. She is the clump of gunk in the stream that is diverting the water from its natural and most efficient path. And she seems to be creating this diversion knowingly, choosing her own defense at the expense of what can be accomplished by the administration.

Caution: left lane ends in 200 feet
Waterboarding is torture. That is Obama’s point. And it appears we have consensus on that. We can now shift the debate to Obama’s desired conversation: Should America be involved with torture (or the Orwellian “enhanced interrogation techniques”)? But for some reason Pelosi has changed the debate to “What did Nancy know, and when?”
Okay, so maybe she didn’t start the Nancy debate, but she sure has fed it. And she has fed it with the partisan language that validates the relevance of the Republican party. Here’s Pelosi’s quote at yesterday’s press conference speaking about the Republicans:
“They misrepresented every step of the way, and they don’t want that focus on them, so they try to turn the attention on us.”
We’re back to the them and us discussion that Obama is trying so hard to avoid. We’re focusing on who is at fault for waterboarding, rather than moving forward and discussing whether it should have been done at all or should be done going forward.
The discussion about American ideals and compromise of those ideals is central to Obama’s policies, not just in this specific case but for all issues. But instead of elevating the debate to “Do the ends justify the means?” Pelosi has devolved the debate to “What do the CIA meeting notes mean?”